The Psychology of the “Second Brain” and 5 Effective Habits to Harvest It

Introduction

In recent years, the idea of building a “second brain” has gained immense popularity. Apps like Notion, Obsidian, Roam Research, and Evernote promise a powerful outcome: freedom from forgetting. By storing ideas, notes, links, and insights externally, we can supposedly think better, create more, and reduce cognitive overload.

But psychology asks a deeper question: what happens to human memory when we stop relying on it?

Read More: Social Media and Mental Health

What Is a “Second Brain”?

A “second brain” refers to an external system used to store, organize, and retrieve information that would otherwise be held in biological memory. From a psychological perspective, this is a form of external memory—a long-standing human behavior that includes writing, calendars, and maps.

What makes modern second brains different is:

• Instant searchability
• Massive storage capacity
• Continuous availability

This fundamentally alters how memory functions in daily life.

Cognitive Offloading

Psychologists call this process cognitive offloading—the use of physical or digital tools to reduce mental effort (Risko & Gilbert, 2016).

Examples include:

• Writing notes instead of memorizing
• Saving reminders instead of remembering tasks
• Bookmarking articles instead of reading deeply

Cognitive offloading is not inherently harmful. In fact, it can free up cognitive resources for problem-solving and creativity. However, problems arise when offloading replaces active thinking rather than supporting it.

The Google Effect and Memory Shift

One of the most influential findings in this area is known as the Google Effect. Research shows that when people expect information to be saved externally, they are less likely to remember the information itself and more likely to remember where to find it (Sparrow, Liu, & Wegner, 2011).

This means:

• Memory shifts from content-based to location-based
• Recall weakens, while retrieval navigation strengthens
• Understanding may decrease even as access increases

In second brain systems, users often remember that they wrote something—but not what they learned.

Are Note-Taking Apps Making Memory Worse?

The answer is nuanced.

Research suggests memory is not disappearing—it is reorganizing. Humans are adapting to a new cognitive environment where:

• Long-term memory stores fewer facts
• Meta-memory (memory about memory) increases
• Tool-dependence grows

However, deep learning depends on encoding, not storage. When notes are captured passively (copy-paste, highlights, screenshots), the brain performs minimal processing, leading to shallow encoding.

This reduces:

• Conceptual understanding
• Transfer of knowledge
• Creative synthesis

The Illusion of Knowledge

One major psychological risk of second brains is the illusion of knowledge. When information is easily accessible, people often overestimate how well they understand it.

This is linked to fluency bias, where ease of access is mistaken for mastery (Alter & Oppenheimer, 2009).

Digital notes can feel like learning, without the discomfort required for actual learning—such as summarizing, questioning, and reorganizing ideas.

Handwriting vs. Digital Notes

Studies comparing handwritten and typed notes show that handwriting often leads to better comprehension and retention (Mueller & Oppenheimer, 2014). This is because handwriting forces:

• Selective attention
• Paraphrasing
• Conceptual processing

Most digital second brain systems encourage speed and volume, which can undermine these benefits unless intentionally designed otherwise.

When a Second Brain Helps Thinking

Second brains are most effective when used to:

• Connect ideas across time
• Revisit and refine insights
• Support synthesis, not hoarding

Psychologically healthy second brains act as thinking partners, not storage units.

Effective practices include:

• Writing notes in your own words
• Revisiting notes regularly
• Linking concepts instead of archiving information
• Asking questions within notes

 

The Identity Shift

Another subtle psychological change is identity-based. Instead of being knowers, people become curators of knowledge. While curation has value, it can distance individuals from embodied understanding.

Thinking is not just information access—it is integration, emotion, and experience.

Conclusion

The psychology of the second brain reveals a paradox: external memory can either expand cognition or hollow it out, depending on how it is used.

Note-taking apps do not weaken memory by default—but unreflective offloading weakens thinking. The healthiest second brains are those that demand engagement, not convenience.

Ultimately, the goal is not to remember less—but to think better.

References

Alter, A. L., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2009). Uniting the tribes of fluency. Personality and Social Psychology Review.

Mueller, P. A., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2014). The pen is mightier than the keyboard. Psychological Science.

Risko, E. F., & Gilbert, S. J. (2016). Cognitive offloading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

Sparrow, B., Liu, J., & Wegner, D. M. (2011). Google Effects on Memory. Science.